A Michigan third-party car accident claim lawyer pursues the losses your no-fault benefits will never pay, including pain and suffering and the medical bills that run past your policy limit.
Christensen Law is a Michigan trial firm with offices in Southfield, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Ann Arbor, and Troy, and this second claim is where most of the value in a serious injury case actually sits.
Your own insurer handles the first claim. Somebody has to build the second one.
If your injuries are significant, call our Michigan third-party liability auto claim attorney at (248) 900-9000, and we will tell you whether a third-party case is realistic.
CHRISTENSEN LAW HAS A 24 HOUR RAPID RESPONSE SERVICE
What Is a Third-Party Car Accident Claim in Michigan?
A third-party claim is a fault-based case against the driver who caused your crash, brought separately from the no-fault benefits your own insurer owes you. Michigan splits every serious auto case into two tracks, and they operate under different rules, proofs, and deadlines.
The first-party claim is your Personal Injury Protection claim. It pays medical care and part of your wage loss regardless of who was responsible, and fault never enters into it.
The third-party claim is the opposite. Fault is the whole question, and the reward for proving it is access to categories of loss that no-fault simply does not reach. Our overview of the Michigan car accident claims process sets out how the two tracks develop alongside each other.
When Can You Sue the At-Fault Driver?
You can pursue pain and suffering only if your injury clears a statutory threshold, which is the single biggest gate in Michigan auto law. MCL 500.3135 limits noneconomic damages to cases involving death, permanent serious disfigurement, or a serious impairment of body function.
The statute defines serious impairment as an objectively manifested impairment of an important body function that affects the person’s general ability to lead a normal life. Each of those three elements gets tested separately by the defense.
Objectively, the piece that decides most disputes is the one that manifests. The impairment must be observable or perceptible from actual symptoms or conditions, rather than reported by the injured person alone, which places the emphasis squarely on imaging, surgical findings, and documented functional restrictions.
Whether the threshold is met can be a question of law for the judge when there is no material factual dispute about the nature and extent of the injuries. That makes early, careful medical documentation more consequential than most people expect.
What Damages Does a Third-Party Claim Cover?
A third-party claim reaches two broad categories, and both of them are closed to you in a PIP claim. This is why the case is worth building even when your no-fault benefits are being paid without argument.
- Pain, suffering, and emotional distress connected to the injury
- Loss of the ability to take part in activities, work, and relationships you valued
- Excess medical expenses above the PIP coverage level on your policy
- Wage loss continuing past the three-year no-fault period
- Loss of future earning capacity where you cannot return to your prior work
- Damages for surviving family members in a fatal crash
Every one of these categories has to be proved with evidence rather than asserted. Future losses in particular call for treating physician opinion and, in larger cases, vocational and economic analysis.
Non-economic damages have no fixed measure in Michigan, which cuts both ways. There is no statutory cap on pain and suffering in an auto case, and there is also no table telling a jury what a shattered pelvis is worth.
What fills that gap is specificity. A record showing what a person could do before the crash and cannot do now carries far more weight than a general assertion of suffering, and building it means asking clients uncomfortable questions early about work, sleep, hobbies, and family life.
Excess Economic Loss After the 2019 No-Fault Reform
The 2019 reform made the excess economic loss piece of a third-party claim far more important than it used to be. Before the change, most Michigan drivers carried unlimited PIP medical coverage, so medical bills rarely exceeded the policy.
That is no longer true. Under MCL 500.3107c, drivers now select from set coverage levels, and someone who chooses $250,000 in a catastrophic injury case will exhaust it. Everything past that limit becomes an excess economic loss claim against the at-fault driver under MCL 500.3135.
The same logic applies to wage loss. No-fault pays a portion of lost income for a maximum of three years, so a person with a permanent disability has decades of uncompensated earnings sitting outside the first-party claim.
A Michigan excess economic loss claim lawyer has to project those numbers rather than tally receipts. That work depends on medical prognosis, life care planning, and a realistic view of what the injured person can still earn.
How Does Shared Fault Affect a Third-Party Claim?
Shared fault reduces what you recover, and past a certain point, it eliminates part of the claim entirely. Under MCL 600.2959, damages are reduced in proportion to your share of responsibility.
The hard line sits at more than 50%. A person found more than half at fault cannot recover non-economic damages at all, though economic damages may still be reduced rather than barred.
Insurers understand this arithmetic very well, which is why comparative fault arguments arrive early and often. A suggestion that you were 25% responsible is worth a quarter of the case to the carrier, and it costs them nothing to raise.
There is a separate trap for uninsured vehicle owners. Someone injured while operating their own uninsured vehicle is barred from noneconomic damages under MCL 500.3135(2)(c), and from PIP benefits under MCL 500.3113(b), which is a harsh result even when the other driver was plainly at fault.
Why Injured Michiganders Bring These Claims to Christensen Law
We are a trial firm, and third-party claims are decided by what a jury would do with the evidence. An insurer valuing a threshold dispute weighs who is on the other side of it.
- We work exclusively under Michigan law, including the threshold and excess-loss rules that shape every one of these cases
- Five Michigan offices, in Southfield, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Ann Arbor, and Troy, with cases handled statewide
- Our focus is serious and catastrophic injury, which is where third-party value is concentrated
- We decline cases we are not positioned to litigate properly, so the files we accept get real attention
- We build the medical and economic record early rather than assembling it under deadline pressure
Threshold cases reward preparation more than argument. If your injuries are serious and you are being told your case is worth very little, call (248) 900-9000 and let us look at the file.
How Does a Michigan Third-Party Liability Claim Get Built?
The case is assembled from three records that develop at different speeds, and the sequencing matters. Filing early with a thin record invites a low valuation that is hard to move later.
The liability record
This is the crash itself. Vehicle data, reconstruction analysis, scene evidence, the traffic crash report, and witness accounts establish who was responsible and to what degree, and most of it has to be secured within weeks rather than months.
The medical record
Threshold cases live or die here. We work with treating physicians to document objective findings, functional restrictions, and prognosis, because a record stating only that the patient reports pain will not support a non-economic claim.
The damages record
This one takes the longest. Wage records, tax returns, employer statements, and, where the injury is permanent, vocational and economic analysis, establish the excess economic loss figure that no-fault will never reach.
These three tracks run at once, and a case is ready to value only when all three are complete. That is the main reason we resist settling a serious file while treatment is still in progress.
I recommend all of my friends and family to Christensen Law. The attorneys and staff there are amazing and really care about their clients where you're treated with care and not...
Jason Waddell
Excellent! From the 1st interaction with Christensen Law it was a positive, wonderful experience! Dustin, Samantha and the entire staff, had...
Susan Schroeder
Christensen Law’s attorneys are filled with compassion and knowledge They took amazing care of my uncle after his accident. I would recommend then to anyone injured in an auto...
Steve Huber
The team at Christensen Law impressed me with their vast knowledge and experience in handling... They were well-versed in the intricacies of the law and provided me with clear explanations of my rights and legal...
Shana Goodrich
It is with extreme gratitude and positive emotions that I write about my relationship with... I presented to them a situation that was quite scary and financially overwhelming. David and his kind staff listened to...
Wendy Henn
If it wasn't for Christensen Law, I don't know where I would be today. Thanks to Dave, Stephanie, and Michelle for getting me through this hard time. I didn't know what to do, I...
Tim Taylor
My name is Erin, my experience with Christensen Law was Overwhelming… But in the very... Christianson Law stepped in after my motorcycle accident when another firm had dropped the ball—and they completely and very quickly...
Erin Magee
I hired this law firm after being hit by a drunk driver in my of... They were communicative, compassionate, made the process easy for me to understand. I was able to effectively receive a size-able...
Wren Bell
From the moment I spoke with Dustin, I felt like I was in good hands He, Samantha, and the entire staff at Christensen Law treated me like family, demonstrating kindness, expertise, and a genuine interest...
Janelle Garza
I am extremely pleased with the experience I had with this law firm, and their... The Christensen Law firm, compassionate approach to my injuries. Their attentive listening, and thorough understanding are truly commendable I highly...
Mr. Douglas
I was in difficult time in my life, it’s a great to know I have... Whole team of Christensen law is amazing and wonderful from start to finish. They often contact me to see how...
Amandeep Sohal
I had an excellent experience working with Christensen Law on my settlement case. From start to finish, the entire team was professional, compassionate, and dedicated to achieving the best possible outcome for me....
Gjon Ivezaj
How Insurers Push Back on Michigan Third-Party Liability Claims
The defense playbook in these cases is consistent, and knowing it in advance changes how a claim gets documented from the first week.
- Arguing the injury is not objectively manifested, usually through a records review physician
- Attributing your symptoms to a pre-existing condition or a degenerative finding on imaging
- Pointing to gaps in treatment as proof the injury resolved
- Using social media and surveillance to suggest you lead a normal life
- Shifting a share of fault onto you to shrink or bar the non-economic claim
- Offering an early settlement before the full extent of the injury is known
None of these tactics is improper on its own, and all of them are answerable with a well-kept record. The common thread is that they exploit thin documentation, which is why we push clients to keep treating and keep reporting honestly.
Deadlines and Evidence in a Michigan Third-Party Case
You generally have three years from the date of the crash to sue the at-fault driver under MCL 600.5805. That is a longer runway than the one-year no-fault notice deadline, and the gap lulls people into waiting.
Waiting costs evidence rather than time. Vehicle data, camera footage, and witness recollection degrade within weeks, and a threshold case built on a thin early record is much harder to rescue later.
Claims involving a government vehicle or a road authority carry their own, far shorter notice requirements. Our discussion of how a Michigan crash settlement is calculated covers what goes into valuing these claims once the record exists.
FAQs about Suing the At-Fault Driver After a Michigan Car Accident
These are the questions Michigan clients ask most often once they understand there are two separate claims in play.
No. The two claims run in parallel, and in practice, they should. Your PIP benefits keep medical care and wage replacement moving while the liability case is investigated and developed.
Look at your own policy next. Underinsured motorist coverage, if you carry it, can respond when the at-fault driver’s liability limits do not cover your losses. Other defendants may also exist, particularly if the driver was working at the time.
Most cases resolve without a trial, but that outcome depends on being genuinely prepared for one. Cases that are visibly built for trial tend to settle on better terms than cases that are not.
Yes, and passengers are often in a stronger position because comparative fault rarely applies to them. A passenger may have a claim against the driver of the vehicle they were riding in, the other driver, or both.
It helps but it does not decide anything. Civil liability is determined on the evidence in the civil case, and a claim can succeed where no citation was issued or fail where one was.
A pre-existing condition does not bar a claim. Michigan law recognizes aggravation of an existing condition, though it puts a premium on prior medical records that show your baseline before the crash.
Speak With a Michigan Third-Party Car Accident Claims Lawyer
If your losses have outgrown what no-fault will pay, the second claim is the one that matters, and it is not a claim your own insurer will build for you. We will look at your injuries, your policy, and your medical record and give you a straight assessment.
Call Christensen Law at (248) 900-9000 or reach us through our contact page. We also handle claims where the responsible driver had no coverage at all, through our Michigan uninsured driver practice, and we represent injured people in every county in the state.
